Sure, I may have misunderstood. It happens. I'll explain my train of thought.

You say you're pro-choice: "I’m pro-choice."

You say "I don’t believe the government should have a right to dictate what a person does with their body — even if that means they get to kill someone who is currently living inside of them…"

At this point it seems correct to state that you believe people should be able to do what they want with their body even if it kills their unborn baby. And to be clear I'm not discounting your point about morals, but I am focusing on what you believe should be legal/allowed.

Next you compare being pro-choice and being pro-mask, pointing out that if the belief in the principle of bodily autonomy leads one to be pro-choice then they should not be pro-mask. Wearing a mask during our current pandemic serves to prevent the spread of a disease that can kill people. If you believe that bodily autonomy takes precedence over mandating masks, and it sounds like you do, then it seems accurate to state that you believe people should "be able to do whatever they want with their bodies even if it endangers or kills other people."

If I am misunderstanding you, perhaps you could try explaning yourself differently rather than insulting me.